Melanie Spiller and Coloratura Consulting
Copyright 2020 Melanie Spiller. All rights reserved.
Composer Biography: Antoine Brumel (c1460-c1515)
Melanie Spiller and Coloratura Consulting
Antoine Brumel was a French composer, and probably the first of the Franco-Flemish school to be from
France. Most of the Franco-Flemish composers were from the lowlands area that is now Belgium and the
Netherlands, once called Flanders.
When polyphony (independently composed lines rather than composed around chords) was a new thing,
just evolving from homophony (unison chant), Brumel was the first to apply this new technique to the
psalms that were sung at every Mass. Polyphony had gained in importance in the 13
th
and 14
th
centuries, but
was mostly used for secular music. Guillaume Machaut (c1300-1377) was the first to write the Ordinaries of
the Mass (Kyrie, Gloria, Credo, Sanctus, Agnus Dei, and the Ite, misse est) as polyphony, and slowly, the
Propers (the Introit, Gradual, Offertory, Communion, Marian antiphons, and later, the Tract) were added.
Psalms were—and are—a common choice for text for the Ordinaries, so that Brumel was the first to do this
is an important accomplishment.
It’s not known where Brumel was born, although some music historians say that he was born west of
Chartres, possibly in the little town of Brunelles. This puts him in the Netherlands, but just across the border
that would soon move to make him French.
His name is prominent among the handful of composers who rank after Josquin de Prez (c1440-1521) as the
most eminent masters of the late 15
th
century and early 16
th
centuries. You’ve probably heard Brumel’s
music—or music influenced by him—whether you know it or not.
Records show Brumel as a singer at Notre Dame in Chartres from 1483 until 1486. He became Master of the
Innocents (children’s choirmaster) at St. Peter’s in Geneva in 1486 and stayed there until 1492. In 1497, he
was installed as a canon at Laon Cathedral, and the following year, he took charge of the choirboys at Notre
Dame in Paris. There he stayed until 1500.
For the next two years, Brumel was a singer at the Duke of Savoy’s Court in Chambery and from 1506 to
1510, he acted as maestro di cappel to Alfonso I d’Este (1476-1534) in Ferrara, replacing Jacob Obrecht
(c1457-1505, blog post to come), who’d died of the plague the previous year. The post was meant to be for
life, but that chapel was disbanded in 1510. Brumel stayed on in Italy as part of the Franco-Flemish musical
invasion and he’s connected with both Faenza and Mantua, where he probably died in 1512 or thereabout,
although there are stories of him dying in Ferrara as late as 1520.
He wrote at least one piece after he was dismissed from Alfonso I’s court, the Missa de beata virgine. In
1513, Brumel is mentioned in a treatise by Vincenzo Galilei (c1520-1591 and famous astronomer Gallileo’s
father) as one of a group of composers who met with Pope Leo X (1475-1521). Because Vincenzo Galilei
didn’t write his treatise for more than two decades after the event and hadn’t been there himself, it’s also
possible that Brumel wasn’t there at all, one reason for his absence being that he was already dead by then.
Brumel was renowned on the musical scene during his lifetime and his music was performed far from where
he lived. Josquin borrowed two voices from Brumel’s three-part motet and based his own piece, Missa
Mater patris on it. Josquin’s Agnus Dei movement consists of the entire text from Brumel’s motet, plus two
new voices. Josquin did this in some of his secular music as well, but it’s unusual to find Josquin using
someone else’s work so literally right at the most climactic section of the Mass.
Brumel had a whole volume of his Masses published by Pandolfo Petrucci (1452-1512), like both Josquin and
Obrecht, and his music appears peppered all over various manuscripts and collections of the period.
Musicological historian Glareanus said that Brumel excelled more through industry than natural gifts, but his
music is truly lovely, so Glareanus was just a poor sport. You should listen for yourself and see what you
think. (Chanticleer put out an excellent album of Brumel’s music, which is how I first heard his works.)
Glareanus’ attitude might have been sour only because there was so much competition. Brumel was active
at the same time as Jacob Obrecht (c1457-1505, blog post to come), Alexander Agricola (1446-1506, blog
post to come), Heinrich Isaac (c1450-1517, blog post to come), Loyset Compere (c1445-1518, blog post to
come), Josquin, Pierre de la Rue (c1452-1518, blog post to come), and Jean Mouton (c1459-1522), who are
considered the brightest lights in a particularly stellar time.
When Johannes Ockeghem died, Brumel was one of those called upon by Guillaume Cretin (c1460-1525, a
poet) to compose a lamentation in Ockeghem’s honor.
Brumel was primarily a composer of sacred music, notably of Masses. There are twelve Masses and three
Magnifacats that survive complete. His works can be divided into three stylistic groups: those with cantus
firmus (the chant melody) underlying the tenor voice, those exhibiting greater rhythmic regularity and a
closer relationship between text and melody in all parts, and those that are condensed and brief.
He also wrote 29 motets (a sacred version of the madrigal), many of which use cantus firmus, sometimes
with an altered or completely different text (these were usually quotations from the Bible, so this straying
was rare and notable), and are in a flowing and rhythmically interesting style. His Sicut lilium is one of these,
and exhibits an attractive simplicity that suggests influence by Italian composers.
Sometimes Brumel embellishes and other times he simplifies the underlying chant melodies for his sacred
pieces. He occasionally uses cantus firmus with the elongated notes in the tenor, and other times, it’s
paraphrased in the superius (highest) voice only. In yet other pieces, the chant is paraphrased in both the
tenor and the superius, and occasionally, it’s in all the voices, in imitation (see Johannes Ciconia for more
about imitation).
Brumel excelled at a style called paraphrase, where the melody of the chant, instead of being in the tenor, is
in the topmost voice. Guillaume Dufay was probably the first to use paraphrase in a Mass setting (listen to
Ave regina coelorum, written between 1463 and 1474 for a good example), and other composers were quick
to follow. Brumel also used bits of his own motets in his Masses, foreshadowing the parody technique (see
my blog Composer Biography: Bartholomeo da Bologna for more about parody). By the 1470s or 1480s,
Masses started appearing that had the paraphrase in more than one voice, such as those by Johannes
Martini (c1440-c1498).
Brumel was an important part of the change from writing independent, parallel lines of polyphony (where a
singer could get sick or die of the plague or something, and the piece still sounded good with the part
missing) to writing dependent, chordal, and simultaneous lines (where all the singers had to show up for
work or the piece fell apart). His earlier works (before 1500) use the cantus firmus or a similar style of
polyphony. His later works (after 1500) line up into more chord-like progressions, which included less
melodically independent lines that served mainly to fill in a part of the chord. (This is very common today,
with the melody in the soprano line and the other parts forming chords that support the melody.)
Brumel also used the parody technique, made popular by Bartholomeo da Bologna (see my blog), wherein
the source material appears elaborately altered and in other voices than the tenor. He also used paired
imitation, like Josquin did, but more freely than any previous composer.
He wrote quite a few motets, chansons, and some instrumental music. His earlier pieces have irregular lines
and rhythmic complexity, like those of Ockeghem, and the later ones use the smooth imitative polyphony of
Josquin’s style and homophonic textures of the Italian composers of the time, such as Bartolomeo
Tromboncino (c1470-1535), who was in Ferrara at the same time as Brumel.
Brumel was notable for his cleverness, playing with melodies and accompaniment. For instance, the tenor
line of his James que la ne peut ester chanson uses the opening phrase of “Je ne vis oncques” twice; first
forward and then backward.
Brumel’s motet Regina coeli was a clear paraphrase of the Marian antiphon by the same name. It has the
melody in the tenor, but it’s also found in the other voices. He uses the same paraphrase and chant
permeation of the texture in his motet Lauda Sion, in which he wrote polyphony only for the odd-numbered
verses.
Brumel’s Laudate Dominum is one of the earliest motet settings of a psalm that can be given an approximate
date. Although printer Ottaviano Petrucci (1466-1539) included Josquin’s psalm Memor esto in the same
publication of 1514, Brumel’s piece can be traced back to 1507, the date on the Capella Sistina 42
manuscript.
Brumel and Josquin clearly had a healthy working relationship. Josquin based his own Mass on Brumel’s
motet Mater Patris, and Brumel’s short and simple motet Sicut lilium has clear phrases that resemble
Josquin’s Planxit autem David. Josquin wasn’t the only one to borrow from Brumel. Ockeghem’s Fors
seulement l’attente has a tenor that is attributed both to Brumel and to Agricola, but is most likely from
Brumel, based on dates.
Brumel’s secular works frequently use pre-existing melodies. His four part secular pieces have texts but
those in three parts are purely instrumental. Most are chansons. You have to keep in mind that writing in
four voices was a new thing. And writing in more voices was considerably rarer.
Brumel wrote a textless vocal piece in eight voices that is sung with each part in a different mode. (To learn
about modes, read Musical Modes, Part 1: Church Modes). Although the modes are simpler than modern
key signatures and scales (no sharps at all and only one possible flat—B), it must have sounded like the
various parts were being pushed and pulled by the other parts. This interesting concept didn’t catch on. (I
didn’t find the name of this piece, but I’ll keep looking.)
Probably the pinnacle of Brumel’s accomplishment was a twelve-part Mass, Et ecce terrae motus. You have
to realize what an achievement that was—most pieces at the time were written in two or three voices. Later,
Thomas Tallis would write my favorite piece (Spem in alium) in 40 voices, a feat that couldn’t ever have been,
had Brumel and his peers not pushed the edges of tradition.
Brumel’s Missa de Beata Virgine and Josquin’s version of the same piece use different chants in their Sanctus
and Agnus Dei movements—Brumel’s was based on Gregorian Mass IX and XVII respectively, and Josquin’s
was based on IV. Brumel’s choice was from the Medicean edition of the chant, which is an interesting
political tidbit. The Medici family was rich and powerful, as you probably already know. The rest of Brumel’s
Masses use the same Mass movements as the chants they’re based on
It’s possible that Brumel wrote his Missa de Beata Virgine in competition with Josquin—you have to listen to
both to decide who won for yourself. Generally speaking, Brumel’s Masses are conspicuous for their
melodiousness and euphony and this particular work was his most popular during his lifetime, as recorded
by Glareanus.
The rest of his Masses were in four voices. He often wrote simple note-against-note counterpoint, which is
especially conspicuous in his Missa de Dringhs, (no one seems to know what that last word means, but it’s
thought to be Greek. The Mass is in Latin). He used parallel thirds and sixths in the Benedictus movement
and other pieces, so that may have been a popular sound (it’s strange sounding to modern ears) or just
something he was experimenting with.
The Mass called O quam suavis is lost. It has only a few surviving movements, based on an antiphon by the
same name. Another untitled Mass uses different source materials for each section. It was unusual for the
chant from one part of the Ordinary of the Mass (the pieces that change with the days of the liturgical
calendar) to be used in a polyphonic setting for another. This is probably where Brumel got the idea of
setting a psalm to polyphony.
In his Mass Je n’ay dueil, which survives under the designation Missa Festiva, is based on Agricola’s chanson
by the same name. Brumel’s Missa Pro defunctis is notable for being the first requiem Mass to include a
polyphonic setting of the Dies Irae. It’s one of the earliest surviving requiems, with only Ockeghem’s being
earlier.
One of Bumel’s distinctive styles is that he often used quick syllables to form chords, which anticipated the
madrigal style that developed by the end of the 16
th
century. He was particularly fond of using this technique
during the Credo sections of his Masses. Credos have the longest texts, which can make them very long, and
using this style helped keep the movement the same length as the others in the Mass.
Quite a few notable composers wrote pieces commemorating Brumel after his death.
Jachet Brumel (no dates available), was an organist for the Ferrara court in 1543, and is presumed to have
been Antoine’s son. I found no mention of a wife or other children.
Sources
“The Norton/Grove Concise Encyclopedia of Music,” edited by Stanley Sadie. W.W. Norton, New York, 1994.
“Harvard Concise Dictionary of Music,” by Don Michael Randel. The Belknap Press of Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, 1974.
“A Dictionary of Early Music, from the Troubadours to Monteverdi,” by Jerome & Elizabeth Roche. Oxford
University Press, New York, 1981.
“The Concise Oxford History of Music,” by Gerard Abraham. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985.
“The Pelican History of Music, Volume 2: Renaissance and Baroque,” edited by Alec Robertson and Denis
Stevens. Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1973.
“Music in the Renaissance,” by Gustave Reese. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 1959.