Melanie Spiller and Coloratura Consulting
Copyright 2020 Melanie Spiller. All rights reserved.
Writing Groups: Preparing for a Meeting
Melanie Spiller and Coloratura Consulting
In my last post, I talked about what writing groups are and why you want to find one. In this post,
I’ll talk about your responsibilities as a member.
In my writing group, submissions are sent as attachments to emails. We are expected to send a
“got it!” response, and sometimes there are formatting issues to iron out. The submissions can
arrive anytime from immediately following the meeting to the weekend prior to the next meeting.
We are expected to know things like proper formatting for the type of work we submit (it’s different
for non-fiction and fiction books, different again for contest and magazine submissions, and
different again for cover letters and synopses).
Pretty much anything is fair game for a submission, including cover letters and such (presuming
that we’ve read the work described), and one of our number has occasionally woven together
several of his NTEs. No one is obligated to submit each month, and those who have just
completed a long haul (first or second drafts, or publication, for instance) don’t need to feel
obligated to submit anything as long as they contribute feedback.
Reviewing the work is the core objective of the gathering. I find that I have to read each
submission more than once to give each submission a decent review. I mark the passages that I
like as I go, do line edits because I can’t help myself, and make marginal comments in my nearly
illegible purple pen scrawling. Some people do these things on the computer, some do one pass
on the computer and another by hand. Some people write up separate comments and notes,
others write on the back of the last page. It’s all good. The important thing is to carefully consider
what has been written and to make thoughtful comments.
It’s important to look for things like:
Continuity: Did you say he had on a black jacket and now it’s green?
Character: Would the character, as you’ve come to understand him, behave this way? (This
comes up a lot in mystery fiction, especially where there is a policeman involved.)
Grammar, word choices, punctuation: We mostly screen for basic knowledge of these
things before we let you join us, but we have had a couple of participants from the UK
whose choices are often different for cultural reasons. It’s important to know the difference.
Plot: Are we following along? Did you just kill off our favorite character? Are you tossing plot
points in as straw men to hide the fact that your outcome is obvious?
Distractions: Has it wandered off your plot points? Is needing to know the answer to
something keeping you from paying attention? Is a description missing and driving you
crazy?
Length: Are you taking forever to get to the point? Does it feel like a haiku?
Questions: Do you wonder what happened, how it happened, or why it happened, and do
you feel that this will be resolved at some point?
I’ll admit that there are some writers in the group who have me so absorbed by the plot that I
forget to look for anything to comment about. That’s the main reason I give it at least two reads.
Yes, things jump out at the first reading—these are drafts, after all—but some things become clear
in ensuing readings because you know how things work out and you can help the writer focus
when you reread.
In the next blog, I’ll talk about finding a group and who has ended up in the one I’m in.